Search Articles:

 

Home Page

Top Articles

Advertising
Advice
Affiliate Programs
Awards
Business
CGI
Computers
Copywriting
CSS
DHTML
Direct Mail
Domain Names
EBooks
ECommerce
Education
Email
Environment
Family
Finance
Free
Government
Health
Hobbies
Home Business
Home Repair
HTML
Humor
Internet
Javascript
Law



Netcraze Network
Funny Links
Recados Para Orkut
Funny Videos
Street Racing Videos
Crash Videos
Cooking Videos
Sexy Videos
Animal Videos
Surfing Videos
Music News
Funny TV Clips
Fight Videos
Anime Videos
Baseball Videos
Basketball Videos
Football Videos
Golf Videos
Very Funny Pictures
Arcade Games
Myspace Codes
Hockey Videos
Wrestling Videos
Gamer News
Hot Celebs
Fishing Videos
Toys and Gadgets
Movie Trailers
Video Game Trailers
Fitness Videos
Cat Videos
Funny Commercials
Dog Videos
Cheerleading Videos
Poker
Offroad Videos
Hot Links

 Free Facebook Games 
Click Here to add to your profile

 

none

California Financial Privacy Law Partially Invalidated


Published by Richard A. Chapo
Submitted: 21 June,2005

The 9th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals has dealt a blow to privacy advocates by invalidating a California privacy law. In litigation brought by the American Bankers Association and others, the appellate court overruled the finding of a trial judge that the California law could stand. Instead, the appellate justices found the law to be pre-empted in part by the federal 2003 Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act.

When a state law conflicts with a federal one, the federal law takes precedent. For instance, the Supreme Court has ruled abortion to be constitutionally protected. No state may pass anti-abortion laws and have them enforced.

The question at issue in the California law was a section giving California residents the right to block financial institutions from selling their private information to third parties.

A San Francisco trial judge, Morrison C. England, Jr., had ruled the section conflicted with provisions of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act, but was not pre-empted because the federal law allowed for stricter state laws. The 9th Circuit court disagreed.

The case will be returned to Judge Morrison in the next 60 days. He will then determine whether any other provisions dealing with the sale of personal financial information are still enforceable. Given the appellate ruling, it is difficult to imagine a ruling upholding this section of the California law.

Notwithstanding these developments, approximately seventy percent of the California privacy law is still enforceable. Financial institution still must get permission from customers prior to selling or sharing your information with third parties.

You should be concerned about financial institutions selling your private information to others. With all the incidents of identity theft in the news, chances are you will eventually become a target. Banks should be focusing on protecting their customers, not making a buck off private information.

About the Author

Richard A. Chapo is a San Diego Business Lawyer with SanDiegoBusinessLawFirm.com - This article is for information purposes only. Nothing in this article is intended to address the reader’s specific situation nor does it create an attorney-client relationship.

Copyright © 2002-2006 - FreeArticleSearch.com -

ROR